More explicit comparison between hagrid and hockeypuck

This commit is contained in:
Heiko Schaefer 2023-12-03 22:50:37 +01:00
parent b71b19c62a
commit 1f5fab21db
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: DAE9A9050FCCF1EB

View file

@ -595,6 +595,8 @@ Different mechanisms for discovering certificates, and updating certificate data
- The *keys.openpgp.org* service is a "verifying" keyserver: the keyserver software only published identity components (which include email addresses) after sending a verification email to that address, and receiving opt-in consent by the user of the email address. This service makes a different tradeoff: it is centralized, and relying on it to correctly perform the verification step requires trust in the operator. The tradeoff allows the service to only list identity information with the consent of the owner of that identity, and to prevent "enumeration" of the certificates and identities it stores (that is: third parties cannot obtain a list of email addresses in the service's database). By design, this service allows easy publication of revocations without requiring publication of any identity components.
- *SKS-style keyservers* act as a distributed synchronizing database, which accepts certificate information without verification (TODO: does the network handle third party signatures? If so, how?[^hip1]).
One central difference between hockeypuck and hagrid (the software that runs the *keys.openpgp.org* service) is that hockeypuck distributes identity packets and third-party certifications that have indeterminate validity, while hagrid does not.
(cert-flooding)=
### Third-party certification flooding