move dks vs. primary uid note to advanced section

This commit is contained in:
Heiko Schaefer 2023-11-18 17:45:52 +01:00
parent 3d70b9e1d6
commit 32082869fb
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: DAE9A9050FCCF1EB

View file

@ -415,12 +415,16 @@ write, link to chapter 9
Wiktor suggests to check: https://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2018/08/13/openpgp-key-expiration-is-not-a-security-measure/ for important material Wiktor suggests to check: https://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2018/08/13/openpgp-key-expiration-is-not-a-security-measure/ for important material
``` ```
(dks-puid)=
### Metadata about the primary key: In Direct Key Signature vs. in Primary User ID, in v4 and v6 ### Metadata about the primary key: In Direct Key Signature vs. in Primary User ID, in v4 and v6
```{admonition} TODO ```{admonition} TODO
:class: warning :class: warning
write i think crypto-refresh suggests that the direct key signature should hold the default preferences?
we might need to write a more nuanced text here, about how DKS and primary user id interact in v6, and mention the differences to v4?
the primary User ID can also specify metadata about the primary key
``` ```
### Metadata leak of Social Graph ### Metadata leak of Social Graph