mirror of
https://codeberg.org/openpgp/notes.git
synced 2025-09-09 11:19:41 +02:00
fix terminology
This commit is contained in:
parent
d59330a08d
commit
8712e97f8e
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ By contrast, a soft revocation leaves the revoked component or signature valid b
|
|||
Hard revocations address the following problem: If a private key was compromised, then the attacker can issue signatures using that key. This means, the attacker could issue a signature dated before the revocation, impersonating the owner of the key. A recipient of that signature would mistakenly consider this signature valid if the issuing key has been soft revoked. This is a problem.
|
||||
To counteract this problem, it is reasonable to clearly mark compromised keys as suspect at any point in time. That's what hard revocations do.
|
||||
|
||||
On the other hand, if the subkey was merely retired, and the certificate holder moved to a different subkey, then the signatures in the past, made by the retired key, are still correct.
|
||||
On the other hand, if the subkey was merely retired, and the certificate holder moved to a different subkey, then the signatures in the past, made by the retired key, are still valid.
|
||||
|
||||
(append-only)=
|
||||
### Certificates are effectively append-only data structures
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue