mirror of
https://codeberg.org/openpgp/notes.git
synced 2025-09-10 11:49:40 +02:00
removing "Metadata about the primary key: In Direct Key Signature vs. in Primary User ID, in v4 and v6" from ch4. this content should go into ch8.
This commit is contained in:
parent
32082869fb
commit
e83f1b6675
1 changed files with 0 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -415,18 +415,6 @@ write, link to chapter 9
|
||||||
Wiktor suggests to check: https://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2018/08/13/openpgp-key-expiration-is-not-a-security-measure/ for important material
|
Wiktor suggests to check: https://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2018/08/13/openpgp-key-expiration-is-not-a-security-measure/ for important material
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(dks-puid)=
|
|
||||||
### Metadata about the primary key: In Direct Key Signature vs. in Primary User ID, in v4 and v6
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```{admonition} TODO
|
|
||||||
:class: warning
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
i think crypto-refresh suggests that the direct key signature should hold the default preferences?
|
|
||||||
we might need to write a more nuanced text here, about how DKS and primary user id interact in v6, and mention the differences to v4?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
the primary User ID can also specify metadata about the primary key
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Metadata leak of Social Graph
|
### Metadata leak of Social Graph
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```{admonition} TODO
|
```{admonition} TODO
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue